Sunday, 09.29.2024
My site
Site menu
Statistics

Total online: 20
Guests: 20
Users: 0
Login form
Main » 2012 » July » 25 » The anti monopolization still needs law innovation
11:31 AM
The anti monopolization still needs law innovation

Our country the administration monopolize the characteristics of big line of its teachings and undoubtedly lift to rise anti the difficulty of the monopolization.Like, some monopolization state-owners enterprises under the sistuation that sit to hug dominantion stance in the market, the pricing weight hands over by hair to change Wei and sits the benefit of enjoying the monopolization under the experienced government harbouring.

  "Under the current law frame, the consumer and medium and small enterprises repays wholesale oakley sunglasses to process monopolies, the incapability processes its back government sector.Because the former belongs to civil suit, the latter is an administrative action, match anti to a cake of.Is real settle problem, have to consider a law innovation.The highest law can again the proptosis stand is definitely a judicial interpretation, can list as government sector codefendant, this is called civil affair supplementary administrative action.Thus, once judicial decision take effect, monopolies back of the government sector also get to the root of the matter."Liu Jun Hai calls.

  And introduce organization litigation, vindictive damages and legal costs aid system, are also advocated by many industry personages and think this just can truely have the monopolies to quit to fear to and close anti the real results of the monopolization.

  "Hope this year's Standing Committee of the National People's Congress modifies a civil procedure law and introduces organization litigation.Sheet's oakley polarized sunglasses tying only the civil suit of bucket has to innovate, but should makes use of a stitching system resource under the sistuation that the organization litigation didn't°yet is clean cut currently and use good litigation system of representative and steer anti monopolization litigation."Liu Jun Hai calls.

  Zhou Yun thinks that there is treble vindictive damages in the United States the rules of the system, the our country should also erect vindictive damages."But this should at'anti monopolization law'amid state, currently'anti monopolization law'knot submission vs transgressor steer fine, but have never withdrawn to scourge sex recompense.The judicial interpretation incapability revamp place of honor law law section, therefore reply'anti monopolization law'make an amendment." 

  "At'anti monopolization law'in the judicial interpretation, bring into these not that realistic.The vindictive damages involves'liability for tort law', 'consumer equities safeguard law', 'product quality law'the revamp of etc..Currently'liability for tort law'medium have the rules to scourge sex recompense, but more principle, just aim at the product quality of endangering the safety of person wholesale fitted hats subject, don't involve all delicts, therefore, in the future still want a revamp."Dong Zheng3 Zheng3 Qi2 Qi2 De Wei calls.

  In addition, "future if continue a stand'anti monopolization law'judicial interpretation, while recognizing case legal costs certain incapability follow object of action figure charge collect, because the object is usually an astronomical figure, shine on this charge collect nobody can tie lawsuit.Anti monopolization litigation can state to press a charge collect, and the charge is possibly cheap."Zhou Yun professes.Reference:http://www.yoursunglass.com/Cartier-c537.html
Views: 240 | Added by: fashionman | Rating: 0.0/0
Total comments: 0
Name *:
Email *:
Code *:
Search
Calendar
«  July 2012  »
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031
Entries archive
Site friends
  • Create a free website
  • Online Desktop
  • Free Online Games
  • Video Tutorials
  • All HTML Tags
  • Browser Kits
  • Copyright MyCorp © 2024
    Make a free website with uCoz